 |
|
|
|
Next: Does IE provide any classes/objects or events to ..
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: microsoft>public>win98>gen_discussion (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98 RemoveThis @dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.DeleteThis@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.DeleteThis@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.TakeThisOut@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.RemoveThis@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.TakeThisOut@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.TakeThisOut@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98 RemoveThis @dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 24) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98 RemoveThis @dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 25) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.DeleteThis@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 26) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.DeleteThis@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 27) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.RemoveThis@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 28) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.DeleteThis@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 29) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98 DeleteThis @dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 21, 2004
Posts: 2951
|
(Msg. 30) Posted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"98 rules" <win98.RemoveThis@dontbelate.org> wrote in message
news:OqVDvSn$GHA.4864@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
| > BUT, let it be on 98 rules head, IF anyone actually does get slower
or
| > run out of resources over this-- or can't see his screen!
Personally, I
| > have gone back to the way I had it-- 1024x768 resolution, 16-bit
color &
| > LARGE fonts!
| >
| >
| > --
| > Thanks or Good Luck,
|
| Good research, a boon to you pcr.
| I only called it the way it has been for me, and I have no problems.
| The arguement between 16bit ands 32bit can be said to just be an
| arguement, but when it comes to 'results', only a user can decide
regarding
| their own hardware and preferences. (I wear glasses, but Small Icons
and
| small print are much more preferable.)
| Clarity seems to 'me' to be much better at 32 bit.
OK, thanks. Mileage varies per hardware/drivers with those settings, as
I think we already knew. I've had no minute font/unreadability problem
this time around even with a 2" smaller monitor & saw no quick drain on
resources/speed. Maybe I'll go back to 32-bit True Color & run it a
while, though— not just read the Resource Monitor at boot.
Nevertheless, I do believe these adjustments very probably were
warranted in that master post of mine— & I will lift my curse off your
head in 3 months of no mishaps! OK, bye. >> Stay informed about: im having trouble with my color screen looks like safe mode |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
Win 2000/NT/98/ME