 |
|
 |
|
Next: Event ID 3034 - MRxSmb - LanmanRedirector
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 15, 2004 Posts: 67
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:48 am
Post subject: Re: Protective Software [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: microsoft>public>win98>gen_discussion (more info?)
|
|
|
Ron, thank you for the detailed explanation and suggestions. To tell you the
truth, I never paid
attention to what is in the Registry in the way of Starting Programs, since
I would not have taken any chances of doing anything with any entries for
fear of damaging anything. The Starting Programs shown by the msconfig was
all that I have been interested in. Some time back, I did run one registry
cleaner application, but ran into some problems and soon after I reverted to
a backed up copy of the registry.
Again, thank you for your patience and time!
****
"Ron Badour" wrote:
> OK, so that all my thoughts are collocated:
>
> I think AVG and your firewall are OK. I have installed AVG on a few
> computers and it works OK. I've heard favorable comments about your
> firewall but have not personally used it (I have Zone Alarm on mine).
>
> AdAware or Spybot (or both) are essential in the spyware war. CWShredder
> only works on a very few "hard to get
> rid of" spyware programs. HiJackThis is a diagnostic program that is used
> when you cannot figure out exactly what type of spyware program might be
> running on your PC. It provides a list that a security specialist can
> review when providing you help. Belarc Advisor is not protective
> software--it provides a list of your hardware and software.
>
> I do not believe any registry cleaner is safe to use except by the most
> expert users and then they should be used when a specific problem is trying
> to be solved. Alan Edwards and I know quite a bit about the W98 registry
> and we could not figure out why reg cleaners would pull out certain data.
> It was simply too much work to scan the undo files and replace questionable
> items so we quit using reg cleaners. No adverse effects were noted by
> either of us after we quit using cleaners.
>
> I have looked at a myriad of Tweak programs and some are dangerous and some
> are flat wrong in their suggested tweaks. Tweaks by themselves do not give
> a significant increase in speed. You have to be careful if you use them.
>
> Regarding Win.ini: Run= with followed by a blank means nothing is being
> started from this start up point. The Norun= entry means that the program
> that follows it was being started at boot but that it was changed so that it
> did not start at boot. As to what you found that you don't
> understand--google.exe is your best tool:. For example:
>
> TBload.exe: The file TBLOAD.EXE is used to manage the function of running
> the appropriate
> runtime with a given ToolBook/Multimedia ToolBook application. This allows a
> system to run applications created with different versions of ToolBook
> without
> conflict.
>
> To make TBLOAD.EXE work, the TBK file association in the WIN.INI must be set
> to
> this file, and entries for the various versions of ToolBook need to be
> stated
> in the [ToolBook Load Information] section of the ASYM.INI file. TBLOAD.EXE
> only works with ASYM.INI. If you do not have the entries in ASYM.INI, then
> it
> does not work. The ASYM.INI file can typically be found in the windows
> directory of a system where the authoring version of TBK/MTBK 3.0 is
> installed.
>
> Here is an example TBK association from a WIN.INI file:
>
> TBK=D:\MTB30\TBLOAD.EXE ^.TBK
> *****************
>
> Regarding your search of the registry--forget about that. Run msconfig.exe,
> start up tab and look at the programs that are being started there. If you
> don't know what they are, use google search.
>
> --
> Regards
>
>
> Ron Badour, MS MVP for W98
> Tips: http://home.satx.rr.com/badour
> Knowledge Base Info:
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=kbinfo
>
>
>
> "BAP" <BAP.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:1DF10F85-DCDC-4706-B82A-00EB78FF6528@microsoft.com...
> > Ron, I searched WIN.INI for run entries and found only 3 references to it:
> > Run=
> > NORUN = C:\QBWIN\SHOWADV.EXE
> > TBK=C:\WINDOWS\asym\runtime\TBLOAD.EXE^.TBK
> >
> > In msconfig, this is what is checked:
> > AOL Fast Start-System Tray-Scan Registry-Tweak UI-AVG7_CC-AVG7_EMC-AOL Top
> > Speed Monitor-PersFw and AolAcsDaemon1
> >
> > I used RegSeeker to search the Registry for references to "Run" and the
> > number came to 461 entries. They were in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT,
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER,
> > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, and HKEY_LOCAL_MACHILE.
> > To say the least, that number of entries is overwhelming and I would not
> > know what any of them really mean or what to do with of them. Isn't there
> > a
> > way to set up some log file that would list what is happening during
> > startup
> > or when you right/click or left/click the mouse on the initial attempt
> > during
> > a session?
> >
> > This is sort of getting away from the original post regarding protection.
> > My original intent was to see if amongst all the FREE software utilities,
> > that I had downloaded, there might been those that I could get rid of
> > because
> > of being dangerous or not able to do what they were meant to do.
> > For the moment, I assume that AVG and Kerio Firewall are good to have.
> > Thank you for your time.
> > *****
> >
> > "Ron Badour" wrote:
> >
> >> I did not comment on the firewall or AVG because you appeared to be
> >> running
> >> them and were happy with them. Both products are OK.
> >>
> >> There is really nothing wrong with a registry that is 11 mb other than
> >> some
> >> people reported that the scanreg /fix option quit working when the
> >> registry
> >> approached 9 mb. When I used W98 as my primary system, my registry was
> >> around 10 mb and the option worked for me.
> >>
> >> If you want to speed up your computer noticeably, you probably will have
> >> to
> >> upgrade hardware as system tweaks simply do not do much. As far as
> >> speeding
> >> it up after boot, look at what programs are being started at boot and if
> >> you
> >> do not use a program during 95% of your computing sessions, then don't
> >> start
> >> it at boot. To cut back on the number of programs starting at boot,
> >> check
> >> the programs themselves for an option not to load. You might have to
> >> double
> >> click an icon in the tray (others might require a right click) and then
> >> look
> >> for preferences or options. If you cannot find an option, look for the
> >> program in one of the following start up points and remove the reference
> >> to
> >> it:
> >>
> >> Start up folder on the start menu, the load= and run= lines in the
> >> win.ini
> >> and these registry run keys (use regedit.exe):
> >>
> >> 1. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
> >> 2. HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
> >> 3. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce
> >> 4. HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce
> >> 5.
> >> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunServices
> >> 6.
> >> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunServicesOnce
> >> 7.
> >> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce\Setup
> >>
> >> There is a freeware program that makes this process a lot easier to
> >> manage: Startup Manager, http://home.ptd.net/~don5408/toolbox/startupcpl/
> >>
> >> You can use msconfig.exe, startup tab, to disable programs; however, by
> >> doing so, you may lessen its value as a troubleshooting tool. There
> >> might
> >> be some double entries in msconfig--leave those for your AntiVirus
> >> program
> >> and load power profile alone as they are required.
> >>
> >> If you disable an entry in msconfig or remove it from the start up point
> >> and
> >> the program loads again after a reboot, that is an indication that you
> >> missed an option on the program itself. If you don't know what an entry
> >> is,
> >> check here:
> >> http://www.pacs-portal.co.uk/startup_index.htm
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards
> >>
> >>
> >> Ron Badour, MS MVP for W98
> >> Tips: http://home.satx.rr.com/badour
> >> Knowledge Base Info:
> >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=kbinfo
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "BAP" <BAP.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:9CBCEE3F-08A3-4E8A-8281-6A5E0E4CE052@microsoft.com...
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, Ron! I certainly agree about the various applications that
> >> > might
> >> > change the Registry
> >> > contents. The only bothering thought is my Registry size at over 11MB,
> >> > 1.51
> >> > fir User.dat and
> >> > 9.77MB for System.dat. Somewhere I read that it should be about 8MB or
> >> > less.
> >> > My OS is
> >> > W98SE. In reality, that is no big deal to me.
> >> > I see that you do not comment on Kerio PW or AVG.
> >> > Regarding the "tune up" software, my tendency is to look for anything
> >> > that
> >> > might successfully get
> >> > my system to speed up. When the my Computer is powered up and ready to
> >> > go,
> >> > it will initially
> >> > take several seconds before it responds to the L/Ck, and, especially,
> >> > the
> >> > R/Ck of the mouse.
> >> > But, that's another subject.
> >> > **********
> >> >
> >> > "Ron Badour" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> You need to pick one of the spyware programs and regularly run it
> >> >> (after
> >> >> updating the definitions). Spybot or AdAware would be my choice or
> >> >> you
> >> >> could run both if desired. CWShredder only works on a very few "hard
> >> >> to
> >> >> get
> >> >> rid of" spyware programs. HiJackThis is a diagnostic program that is
> >> >> used
> >> >> when you cannot figure out exactly what type of spyware program might
> >> >> be
> >> >> running on your PC. It provides a list that a security specialist can
> >> >> review when providing you help. Belarc Advisor is not protective
> >> >> software--it provides a list of your hardware and software. I would
> >> >> not
> >> >> run
> >> >> a registry cleaner nor any other "tune up" software as they sometimes
> >> >> cause
> >> >> more harm than good.
> >> >> --
> >> >> Regards
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Ron Badour, MS MVP for W98
> >> >> Tips: http://home.satx.rr.com/badour
> >> >> Knowledge Base Info:
> >> >> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=kbinfo
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "BAP" <BAP.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:43F7B937-9FCA-4219-B23C-0027E4BBAB64@microsoft.com...
> >> >> > Posts in this Group and PCWorld articles, often, seem to encourage
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > download software and use it to safeguard against viruses or
> >> >> > intruders.
> >> >> > I
> >> >> > have downloaded several FREE versions of programs to see what they
> >> >> > can
> >> >> > do
> >> >> > for
> >> >> > my setup. However, I have no idea of how some of these may actually
> >> >> > work
> >> >> > or
> >> >> > what should be running, whenever the computer is being powered up or
> >> >> > when
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > Internet is accessed. The only ones that I have presently running
> >> >> > are
> >> >> > Kerio
> >> >> > Personal Firewall and AVG Free Edition. Not knowing how good these
> >> >> > may
> >> >> > be,
> >> >> > I
> >> >> > have also several that are inactive or, perhaps, run at times
> >> >> > without
> >> >> > actually taking any action about the findings. These are:
> >> >> > HijackThis, CWShedder, No Adware, Lavasoft Ad-Aware, XoftSpy,
> >> >> > SpywareBlaster, MRU-Blaster, SE Personal, Cprocess,
> >> >> > Spybot-Search&Destroy,
> >> >> > PCBugDoctor, RegistryFix, RegCure,
> >> >> > EasyCleaner, Registry Mechanic, RegSeeker, RunPCMightyMax,
> >> >> > PCDocPro3.5
> >> >> > and
> >> >> > Belarc Advisor
> >> >> > Would anyone care to advise me as to which may be of value, how it
> >> >> > should
> >> >> > be used, which of the ones listed should be avoided and the good
> >> >> > ones
> >> >> > that
> >> >> > may be missing?
> >> >> > Thank you!
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> >> Stay informed about: Protective Software |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 15, 2004 Posts: 67
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:54 am
Post subject: Re: Protective Software [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Gary, I have downloaded the suggested applications and installed Hosts. I
also modified the shortcut to the HostsManager, as you as suggested. Will
learn more about the two applications as fast as I can.
Thank you for your help!
***
"Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> Scanning email is redundant. Anything that your scanner is going to catch
> it's going to catch as it's launched. So there's no reason to scan ahead of
> time, and that scanning definitely interferes with the delivery of mail,
> often known to cause problems.
>
> A HOSTS file is a database of IP redirects. When your system attempts to go
> to one of the sites listed in the database, it is redirected to some certain
> IP (like DNS, except this happens before DNS is queried.) To use this as a
> protective mechanism, you download some HOSTS file maintained by pros who
> add addresses as they become aware of them. Microsoft MVPs maintain one such
> HOSTS file. Every address in that file is redirected to an address that is
> (almost) always safe: your own computer (127.0.0.1=localhost). If your
> system has no home page (most don't) you get an error page instead. The MVP
> HOSTS file blocks all kinds of adware and malware sites, and when you use it
> to go to pages that have such sites embedded as advertising, you will
> instead see a small chunk of error page in that box.
>
> MVP George Geyde created a small app that regularly checks to see if there's
> a new copy of the MVP HOSTS file available, and if so downloads a new copy.
> Get HOSTS Manager here.
> http://www.mvps.org/PracticallyNerded/Software.htm
>
> (It's at the bottom of the page.)
>
> After you've installed HOSTS Manager, go find the new shortcut in the
> Start>Programs>Startup folder, and change its properties. Use the following
> command instead of the one that's there:
>
> "C:\Program Files\HOSTS File Manager\HostsManager.exe" /u
>
> I do not recommend TUI for anything. Yes, it's quite handy for lots of
> things, but it can get you into trouble, too. Most of the things TUI can do
> (that I'd want to do), I can do just as well without it.
>
> Please see the links on my sig for lots more info.
>
> --
> Gary S. Terhune
> MS MVP Shell/User
> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>
> "BAP" <BAP DeleteThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:978F35FB-D647-4F45-B933-B441D68298C2@microsoft.com...
> > Thanks, Gary for your reply!
> > You probably will see my replies to Ron and Don regarding my views. I have
> > not attempted to have AVG scan my email. You seem to suggest that I should
> > not. Is there a reason?
> > To my knowledge, I do not have HOSTS. Not sure what it is and if available
> > from somewhere. I do have Tweak UI, but I have not used it for anything.
> > Sad that no tune-up tool is full-proof!
> > *****
> >
> > "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with Ron. I would use *one* antivirus that has a resident
> scanner
> > > (scans on the fly, as you're using the computer) but don't have it scan
> > > email. Also scan regularly (during maintenance is when I do it) with
> AdAware
> > > and Spybot. Beyond that, I'd use a couple of passive protection schemes,
> one
> > > using the Restricted Zone in IE (SpywareBlaster does this) and one using
> the
> > > HOSTS file -- like HOSTS Manager.
> > >
> > > *I* might use a Registry Cleaner or two, if I thought Registry guck
> might be
> > > at the root of a particular problem, but I'd be very careful about what
> I
> > > change, and not change anything I wasn't *absolutely* sure about. I
> don't
> > > recommend such tools for the average user, and there's no such thing as
> a
> > > "tune-up tool" or Registry cleaner that is fool proof. That goes for
> > > "tweakers", too.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gary S. Terhune
> > > MS MVP Shell/User
> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
> > >
> > > "BAP" <BAP DeleteThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > > news:43F7B937-9FCA-4219-B23C-0027E4BBAB64@microsoft.com...
> > > > Posts in this Group and PCWorld articles, often, seem to encourage to
> > > > download software and use it to safeguard against viruses or
> intruders. I
> > > > have downloaded several FREE versions of programs to see what they can
> do
> > > for
> > > > my setup. However, I have no idea of how some of these may actually
> work
> > > or
> > > > what should be running, whenever the computer is being powered up or
> when
> > > the
> > > > Internet is accessed. The only ones that I have presently running are
> > > Kerio
> > > > Personal Firewall and AVG Free Edition. Not knowing how good these may
> be,
> > > I
> > > > have also several that are inactive or, perhaps, run at times without
> > > > actually taking any action about the findings. These are:
> > > > HijackThis, CWShedder, No Adware, Lavasoft Ad-Aware, XoftSpy,
> > > > SpywareBlaster, MRU-Blaster, SE Personal, Cprocess,
> Spybot-Search&Destroy,
> > > > PCBugDoctor, RegistryFix, RegCure,
> > > > EasyCleaner, Registry Mechanic, RegSeeker, RunPCMightyMax, PCDocPro3.5
> and
> > > > Belarc Advisor
> > > > Would anyone care to advise me as to which may be of value, how it
> should
> > > > be used, which of the ones listed should be avoided and the good ones
> that
> > > > may be missing?
> > > > Thank you!
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
> >> Stay informed about: Protective Software |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 15, 2004 Posts: 67
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:08 am
Post subject: Re: Protective Software [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Gary, I have downloaded Hosts, installed it and modified its shortcut as you
suggested. No applications were running when I installed it, except for
whatever may have been running in
the background. The icon on the Desktop showed a large ‘G’. After modifying
its properties, I clicked on it and its icon showed up in the Tray area of
the Taskbar. Shortly after that, a display popped up with prompts to log on
to the Internet. Another click on the Desktop Icon added another ‘G’ in the
Tray. I closed all and only the G on the Desktop remained.
This morning, I clicked on the Icon while logged on. The Kerio PSW asked if
to allow the connection and afterwards I could see no activity of any sorts.
The System Information (Start/Accessories/System Information/Sotware
Environment\Running Tasks) shows the HostsManger.exe in the list.
Is this what I should expect?
Is HOSTS running in the background in some fashion?
Is there something to be done from my part?
Thank you for your time!
****
"Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> Scanning email is redundant. Anything that your scanner is going to catch
> it's going to catch as it's launched. So there's no reason to scan ahead of
> time, and that scanning definitely interferes with the delivery of mail,
> often known to cause problems.
>
> A HOSTS file is a database of IP redirects. When your system attempts to go
> to one of the sites listed in the database, it is redirected to some certain
> IP (like DNS, except this happens before DNS is queried.) To use this as a
> protective mechanism, you download some HOSTS file maintained by pros who
> add addresses as they become aware of them. Microsoft MVPs maintain one such
> HOSTS file. Every address in that file is redirected to an address that is
> (almost) always safe: your own computer (127.0.0.1=localhost). If your
> system has no home page (most don't) you get an error page instead. The MVP
> HOSTS file blocks all kinds of adware and malware sites, and when you use it
> to go to pages that have such sites embedded as advertising, you will
> instead see a small chunk of error page in that box.
>
> MVP George Geyde created a small app that regularly checks to see if there's
> a new copy of the MVP HOSTS file available, and if so downloads a new copy.
> Get HOSTS Manager here.
> http://www.mvps.org/PracticallyNerded/Software.htm
>
> (It's at the bottom of the page.)
>
> After you've installed HOSTS Manager, go find the new shortcut in the
> Start>Programs>Startup folder, and change its properties. Use the following
> command instead of the one that's there:
>
> "C:\Program Files\HOSTS File Manager\HostsManager.exe" /u
>
> I do not recommend TUI for anything. Yes, it's quite handy for lots of
> things, but it can get you into trouble, too. Most of the things TUI can do
> (that I'd want to do), I can do just as well without it.
>
> Please see the links on my sig for lots more info.
>
> --
> Gary S. Terhune
> MS MVP Shell/User
> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>
> "BAP" <BAP DeleteThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:978F35FB-D647-4F45-B933-B441D68298C2@microsoft.com...
> > Thanks, Gary for your reply!
> > You probably will see my replies to Ron and Don regarding my views. I have
> > not attempted to have AVG scan my email. You seem to suggest that I should
> > not. Is there a reason?
> > To my knowledge, I do not have HOSTS. Not sure what it is and if available
> > from somewhere. I do have Tweak UI, but I have not used it for anything.
> > Sad that no tune-up tool is full-proof!
> > *****
> >
> > "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> >
> > > I agree with Ron. I would use *one* antivirus that has a resident
> scanner
> > > (scans on the fly, as you're using the computer) but don't have it scan
> > > email. Also scan regularly (during maintenance is when I do it) with
> AdAware
> > > and Spybot. Beyond that, I'd use a couple of passive protection schemes,
> one
> > > using the Restricted Zone in IE (SpywareBlaster does this) and one using
> the
> > > HOSTS file -- like HOSTS Manager.
> > >
> > > *I* might use a Registry Cleaner or two, if I thought Registry guck
> might be
> > > at the root of a particular problem, but I'd be very careful about what
> I
> > > change, and not change anything I wasn't *absolutely* sure about. I
> don't
> > > recommend such tools for the average user, and there's no such thing as
> a
> > > "tune-up tool" or Registry cleaner that is fool proof. That goes for
> > > "tweakers", too.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gary S. Terhune
> > > MS MVP Shell/User
> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
> > >
> > > "BAP" <BAP DeleteThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > > news:43F7B937-9FCA-4219-B23C-0027E4BBAB64@microsoft.com...
> > > > Posts in this Group and PCWorld articles, often, seem to encourage to
> > > > download software and use it to safeguard against viruses or
> intruders. I
> > > > have downloaded several FREE versions of programs to see what they can
> do
> > > for
> > > > my setup. However, I have no idea of how some of these may actually
> work
> > > or
> > > > what should be running, whenever the computer is being powered up or
> when
> > > the
> > > > Internet is accessed. The only ones that I have presently running are
> > > Kerio
> > > > Personal Firewall and AVG Free Edition. Not knowing how good these may
> be,
> > > I
> > > > have also several that are inactive or, perhaps, run at times without
> > > > actually taking any action about the findings. These are:
> > > > HijackThis, CWShedder, No Adware, Lavasoft Ad-Aware, XoftSpy,
> > > > SpywareBlaster, MRU-Blaster, SE Personal, Cprocess,
> Spybot-Search&Destroy,
> > > > PCBugDoctor, RegistryFix, RegCure,
> > > > EasyCleaner, Registry Mechanic, RegSeeker, RunPCMightyMax, PCDocPro3.5
> and
> > > > Belarc Advisor
> > > > Would anyone care to advise me as to which may be of value, how it
> should
> > > > be used, which of the ones listed should be avoided and the good ones
> that
> > > > may be missing?
> > > > Thank you!
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
> >> Stay informed about: Protective Software |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 17, 2004 Posts: 2768
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 4:55 am
Post subject: Re: Protective Software [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Sorry, BAP. I'm up way past my bedtime (5am here in California) and can't
quite decipher what's going on with your HOSTS Manager. I'll get back to you
later (much later) today.
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
"BAP" <BAP.TakeThisOut@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5504BA7E-2A2C-45E0-BEED-43734946D844@microsoft.com...
> Gary, I have downloaded Hosts, installed it and modified its shortcut as
> you
> suggested. No applications were running when I installed it, except for
> whatever may have been running in
> the background. The icon on the Desktop showed a large 'G'. After
> modifying
> its properties, I clicked on it and its icon showed up in the Tray area of
> the Taskbar. Shortly after that, a display popped up with prompts to log
> on
> to the Internet. Another click on the Desktop Icon added another 'G' in
> the
> Tray. I closed all and only the G on the Desktop remained.
> This morning, I clicked on the Icon while logged on. The Kerio PSW asked
> if
> to allow the connection and afterwards I could see no activity of any
> sorts.
> The System Information (Start/Accessories/System Information/Sotware
> Environment\Running Tasks) shows the HostsManger.exe in the list.
> Is this what I should expect?
> Is HOSTS running in the background in some fashion?
> Is there something to be done from my part?
> Thank you for your time!
> ****
> "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
>
>> Scanning email is redundant. Anything that your scanner is going to catch
>> it's going to catch as it's launched. So there's no reason to scan ahead
>> of
>> time, and that scanning definitely interferes with the delivery of mail,
>> often known to cause problems.
>>
>> A HOSTS file is a database of IP redirects. When your system attempts to
>> go
>> to one of the sites listed in the database, it is redirected to some
>> certain
>> IP (like DNS, except this happens before DNS is queried.) To use this as
>> a
>> protective mechanism, you download some HOSTS file maintained by pros who
>> add addresses as they become aware of them. Microsoft MVPs maintain one
>> such
>> HOSTS file. Every address in that file is redirected to an address that
>> is
>> (almost) always safe: your own computer (127.0.0.1=localhost). If your
>> system has no home page (most don't) you get an error page instead. The
>> MVP
>> HOSTS file blocks all kinds of adware and malware sites, and when you use
>> it
>> to go to pages that have such sites embedded as advertising, you will
>> instead see a small chunk of error page in that box.
>>
>> MVP George Geyde created a small app that regularly checks to see if
>> there's
>> a new copy of the MVP HOSTS file available, and if so downloads a new
>> copy.
>> Get HOSTS Manager here.
>> http://www.mvps.org/PracticallyNerded/Software.htm
>>
>> (It's at the bottom of the page.)
>>
>> After you've installed HOSTS Manager, go find the new shortcut in the
>> Start>Programs>Startup folder, and change its properties. Use the
>> following
>> command instead of the one that's there:
>>
>> "C:\Program Files\HOSTS File Manager\HostsManager.exe" /u
>>
>> I do not recommend TUI for anything. Yes, it's quite handy for lots of
>> things, but it can get you into trouble, too. Most of the things TUI can
>> do
>> (that I'd want to do), I can do just as well without it.
>>
>> Please see the links on my sig for lots more info.
>>
>> --
>> Gary S. Terhune
>> MS MVP Shell/User
>> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
>> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>>
>> "BAP" <BAP.TakeThisOut@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:978F35FB-D647-4F45-B933-B441D68298C2@microsoft.com...
>> > Thanks, Gary for your reply!
>> > You probably will see my replies to Ron and Don regarding my views. I
>> > have
>> > not attempted to have AVG scan my email. You seem to suggest that I
>> > should
>> > not. Is there a reason?
>> > To my knowledge, I do not have HOSTS. Not sure what it is and if
>> > available
>> > from somewhere. I do have Tweak UI, but I have not used it for
>> > anything.
>> > Sad that no tune-up tool is full-proof!
>> > *****
>> >
>> > "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
>> >
>> > > I agree with Ron. I would use *one* antivirus that has a resident
>> scanner
>> > > (scans on the fly, as you're using the computer) but don't have it
>> > > scan
>> > > email. Also scan regularly (during maintenance is when I do it) with
>> AdAware
>> > > and Spybot. Beyond that, I'd use a couple of passive protection
>> > > schemes,
>> one
>> > > using the Restricted Zone in IE (SpywareBlaster does this) and one
>> > > using
>> the
>> > > HOSTS file -- like HOSTS Manager.
>> > >
>> > > *I* might use a Registry Cleaner or two, if I thought Registry guck
>> might be
>> > > at the root of a particular problem, but I'd be very careful about
>> > > what
>> I
>> > > change, and not change anything I wasn't *absolutely* sure about. I
>> don't
>> > > recommend such tools for the average user, and there's no such thing
>> > > as
>> a
>> > > "tune-up tool" or Registry cleaner that is fool proof. That goes for
>> > > "tweakers", too.
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Gary S. Terhune
>> > > MS MVP Shell/User
>> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
>> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>> > >
>> > > "BAP" <BAP.TakeThisOut@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:43F7B937-9FCA-4219-B23C-0027E4BBAB64@microsoft.com...
>> > > > Posts in this Group and PCWorld articles, often, seem to encourage
>> > > > to
>> > > > download software and use it to safeguard against viruses or
>> intruders. I
>> > > > have downloaded several FREE versions of programs to see what they
>> > > > can
>> do
>> > > for
>> > > > my setup. However, I have no idea of how some of these may actually
>> work
>> > > or
>> > > > what should be running, whenever the computer is being powered up
>> > > > or
>> when
>> > > the
>> > > > Internet is accessed. The only ones that I have presently running
>> > > > are
>> > > Kerio
>> > > > Personal Firewall and AVG Free Edition. Not knowing how good these
>> > > > may
>> be,
>> > > I
>> > > > have also several that are inactive or, perhaps, run at times
>> > > > without
>> > > > actually taking any action about the findings. These are:
>> > > > HijackThis, CWShedder, No Adware, Lavasoft Ad-Aware, XoftSpy,
>> > > > SpywareBlaster, MRU-Blaster, SE Personal, Cprocess,
>> Spybot-Search&Destroy,
>> > > > PCBugDoctor, RegistryFix, RegCure,
>> > > > EasyCleaner, Registry Mechanic, RegSeeker, RunPCMightyMax,
>> > > > PCDocPro3.5
>> and
>> > > > Belarc Advisor
>> > > > Would anyone care to advise me as to which may be of value, how it
>> should
>> > > > be used, which of the ones listed should be avoided and the good
>> > > > ones
>> that
>> > > > may be missing?
>> > > > Thank you!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>>
>> >> Stay informed about: Protective Software |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 15, 2004 Posts: 67
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:55 am
Post subject: Re: Protective Software [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
That is certainly a long rest, Gary! Easy, Just kidding!
On a serious note, the Hosts Manager appears to have settled down. For a
couple of times, initially, it complained about encountering some
installation problem and asked for a fresh download. Currently, it is listed
in the Starting Programs, but not in the Running Tasks. There is an icon on
the Desktop, but not in the Deskbar tray. The AVG, on the other hand, is
visible in all quoted areas. So, I am assuming that the Hosts Manager is
running in the background and doing what is supposed to be doing.
Unless you feel that I am at risk of any kind, I am fine with it all.
Thank you, again!
****
"Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> Sorry, BAP. I'm up way past my bedtime (5am here in California) and can't
> quite decipher what's going on with your HOSTS Manager. I'll get back to you
> later (much later) today.
>
> --
>
> Gary S. Terhune
> MS-MVP Shell/User
> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>
> "BAP" <BAP RemoveThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:5504BA7E-2A2C-45E0-BEED-43734946D844@microsoft.com...
> > Gary, I have downloaded Hosts, installed it and modified its shortcut as
> > you
> > suggested. No applications were running when I installed it, except for
> > whatever may have been running in
> > the background. The icon on the Desktop showed a large 'G'. After
> > modifying
> > its properties, I clicked on it and its icon showed up in the Tray area of
> > the Taskbar. Shortly after that, a display popped up with prompts to log
> > on
> > to the Internet. Another click on the Desktop Icon added another 'G' in
> > the
> > Tray. I closed all and only the G on the Desktop remained.
> > This morning, I clicked on the Icon while logged on. The Kerio PSW asked
> > if
> > to allow the connection and afterwards I could see no activity of any
> > sorts.
> > The System Information (Start/Accessories/System Information/Sotware
> > Environment\Running Tasks) shows the HostsManger.exe in the list.
> > Is this what I should expect?
> > Is HOSTS running in the background in some fashion?
> > Is there something to be done from my part?
> > Thank you for your time!
> > ****
> > "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> >
> >> Scanning email is redundant. Anything that your scanner is going to catch
> >> it's going to catch as it's launched. So there's no reason to scan ahead
> >> of
> >> time, and that scanning definitely interferes with the delivery of mail,
> >> often known to cause problems.
> >>
> >> A HOSTS file is a database of IP redirects. When your system attempts to
> >> go
> >> to one of the sites listed in the database, it is redirected to some
> >> certain
> >> IP (like DNS, except this happens before DNS is queried.) To use this as
> >> a
> >> protective mechanism, you download some HOSTS file maintained by pros who
> >> add addresses as they become aware of them. Microsoft MVPs maintain one
> >> such
> >> HOSTS file. Every address in that file is redirected to an address that
> >> is
> >> (almost) always safe: your own computer (127.0.0.1=localhost). If your
> >> system has no home page (most don't) you get an error page instead. The
> >> MVP
> >> HOSTS file blocks all kinds of adware and malware sites, and when you use
> >> it
> >> to go to pages that have such sites embedded as advertising, you will
> >> instead see a small chunk of error page in that box.
> >>
> >> MVP George Geyde created a small app that regularly checks to see if
> >> there's
> >> a new copy of the MVP HOSTS file available, and if so downloads a new
> >> copy.
> >> Get HOSTS Manager here.
> >> http://www.mvps.org/PracticallyNerded/Software.htm
> >>
> >> (It's at the bottom of the page.)
> >>
> >> After you've installed HOSTS Manager, go find the new shortcut in the
> >> Start>Programs>Startup folder, and change its properties. Use the
> >> following
> >> command instead of the one that's there:
> >>
> >> "C:\Program Files\HOSTS File Manager\HostsManager.exe" /u
> >>
> >> I do not recommend TUI for anything. Yes, it's quite handy for lots of
> >> things, but it can get you into trouble, too. Most of the things TUI can
> >> do
> >> (that I'd want to do), I can do just as well without it.
> >>
> >> Please see the links on my sig for lots more info.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Gary S. Terhune
> >> MS MVP Shell/User
> >> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
> >> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
> >>
> >> "BAP" <BAP RemoveThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:978F35FB-D647-4F45-B933-B441D68298C2@microsoft.com...
> >> > Thanks, Gary for your reply!
> >> > You probably will see my replies to Ron and Don regarding my views. I
> >> > have
> >> > not attempted to have AVG scan my email. You seem to suggest that I
> >> > should
> >> > not. Is there a reason?
> >> > To my knowledge, I do not have HOSTS. Not sure what it is and if
> >> > available
> >> > from somewhere. I do have Tweak UI, but I have not used it for
> >> > anything.
> >> > Sad that no tune-up tool is full-proof!
> >> > *****
> >> >
> >> > "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I agree with Ron. I would use *one* antivirus that has a resident
> >> scanner
> >> > > (scans on the fly, as you're using the computer) but don't have it
> >> > > scan
> >> > > email. Also scan regularly (during maintenance is when I do it) with
> >> AdAware
> >> > > and Spybot. Beyond that, I'd use a couple of passive protection
> >> > > schemes,
> >> one
> >> > > using the Restricted Zone in IE (SpywareBlaster does this) and one
> >> > > using
> >> the
> >> > > HOSTS file -- like HOSTS Manager.
> >> > >
> >> > > *I* might use a Registry Cleaner or two, if I thought Registry guck
> >> might be
> >> > > at the root of a particular problem, but I'd be very careful about
> >> > > what
> >> I
> >> > > change, and not change anything I wasn't *absolutely* sure about. I
> >> don't
> >> > > recommend such tools for the average user, and there's no such thing
> >> > > as
> >> a
> >> > > "tune-up tool" or Registry cleaner that is fool proof. That goes for
> >> > > "tweakers", too.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Gary S. Terhune
> >> > > MS MVP Shell/User
> >> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
> >> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
> >> > >
> >> > > "BAP" <BAP RemoveThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> > > news:43F7B937-9FCA-4219-B23C-0027E4BBAB64@microsoft.com...
> >> > > > Posts in this Group and PCWorld articles, often, seem to encourage
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > download software and use it to safeguard against viruses or
> >> intruders. I
> >> > > > have downloaded several FREE versions of programs to see what they
> >> > > > can
> >> do
> >> > > for
> >> > > > my setup. However, I have no idea of how some of these may actually
> >> work
> >> > > or
> >> > > > what should be running, whenever the computer is being powered up
> >> > > > or
> >> when
> >> > > the
> >> > > > Internet is accessed. The only ones that I have presently running
> >> > > > are
> >> > > Kerio
> >> > > > Personal Firewall and AVG Free Edition. Not knowing how good these
> >> > > > may
> >> be,
> >> > > I
> >> > > > have also several that are inactive or, perhaps, run at times
> >> > > > without
> >> > > > actually taking any action about the findings. These are:
> >> > > > HijackThis, CWShedder, No Adware, Lavasoft Ad-Aware, XoftSpy,
> >> > > > SpywareBlaster, MRU-Blaster, SE Personal, Cprocess,
> >> Spybot-Search&Destroy,
> >> > > > PCBugDoctor, RegistryFix, RegCure,
> >> > > > EasyCleaner, Registry Mechanic, RegSeeker, RunPCMightyMax,
> >> > > > PCDocPro3.5
> >> and
> >> > > > Belarc Advisor
> >> > > > Would anyone care to advise me as to which may be of value, how it
> >> should
> >> > > > be used, which of the ones listed should be avoided and the good
> >> > > > ones
> >> that
> >> > > > may be missing?
> >> > > > Thank you!
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> >> Stay informed about: Protective Software |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 17, 2004 Posts: 2768
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:51 am
Post subject: Re: Protective Software [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Sorry about that! Things have been *very* hectic and today my brain is
apparently going on strike. Just a few notes to help you with your own
diagnosis:
The default installation of HOSTS Manager does not run in the background.
The Startup entry is for HOSTS Backup, not anything that auto-updates. What
I do is change the Startup link to
"C:\Program Files\Hosts Manager\HostsManager.exe" /u (space in Path, no
space in executable.)
I also make that same command a Scheduled task to run daily, since I almost
never shut my machines down. The /u switch is "unattended", aka silent, with
no prompts.
If actually running Hosts Manager to update, either manually or via the link
above, still causes problems, then we'll have to look at it again.
Meanwhile, I'm going to drag your previous onto my Desktop (which is
currently fairly neat, <s>.) Since I review what's there often, I'll be
reminded to look at it again soon, when my brain is back to what passes for
normal these days.
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
"BAP" <BAP.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:92061517-A3CB-49DA-B449-37CDC1737B61@microsoft.com...
> That is certainly a long rest, Gary! Easy, Just kidding!
> On a serious note, the Hosts Manager appears to have settled down. For a
> couple of times, initially, it complained about encountering some
> installation problem and asked for a fresh download. Currently, it is
> listed
> in the Starting Programs, but not in the Running Tasks. There is an icon
> on
> the Desktop, but not in the Deskbar tray. The AVG, on the other hand, is
> visible in all quoted areas. So, I am assuming that the Hosts Manager is
> running in the background and doing what is supposed to be doing.
> Unless you feel that I am at risk of any kind, I am fine with it all.
> Thank you, again!
> ****
>
> "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
>
>> Sorry, BAP. I'm up way past my bedtime (5am here in California) and can't
>> quite decipher what's going on with your HOSTS Manager. I'll get back to
>> you
>> later (much later) today.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Gary S. Terhune
>> MS-MVP Shell/User
>> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
>> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>>
>> "BAP" <BAP.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:5504BA7E-2A2C-45E0-BEED-43734946D844@microsoft.com...
>> > Gary, I have downloaded Hosts, installed it and modified its shortcut
>> > as
>> > you
>> > suggested. No applications were running when I installed it, except for
>> > whatever may have been running in
>> > the background. The icon on the Desktop showed a large 'G'. After
>> > modifying
>> > its properties, I clicked on it and its icon showed up in the Tray area
>> > of
>> > the Taskbar. Shortly after that, a display popped up with prompts to
>> > log
>> > on
>> > to the Internet. Another click on the Desktop Icon added another 'G' in
>> > the
>> > Tray. I closed all and only the G on the Desktop remained.
>> > This morning, I clicked on the Icon while logged on. The Kerio PSW
>> > asked
>> > if
>> > to allow the connection and afterwards I could see no activity of any
>> > sorts.
>> > The System Information (Start/Accessories/System Information/Sotware
>> > Environment\Running Tasks) shows the HostsManger.exe in the list.
>> > Is this what I should expect?
>> > Is HOSTS running in the background in some fashion?
>> > Is there something to be done from my part?
>> > Thank you for your time!
>> > ****
>> > "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Scanning email is redundant. Anything that your scanner is going to
>> >> catch
>> >> it's going to catch as it's launched. So there's no reason to scan
>> >> ahead
>> >> of
>> >> time, and that scanning definitely interferes with the delivery of
>> >> mail,
>> >> often known to cause problems.
>> >>
>> >> A HOSTS file is a database of IP redirects. When your system attempts
>> >> to
>> >> go
>> >> to one of the sites listed in the database, it is redirected to some
>> >> certain
>> >> IP (like DNS, except this happens before DNS is queried.) To use this
>> >> as
>> >> a
>> >> protective mechanism, you download some HOSTS file maintained by pros
>> >> who
>> >> add addresses as they become aware of them. Microsoft MVPs maintain
>> >> one
>> >> such
>> >> HOSTS file. Every address in that file is redirected to an address
>> >> that
>> >> is
>> >> (almost) always safe: your own computer (127.0.0.1=localhost). If your
>> >> system has no home page (most don't) you get an error page instead.
>> >> The
>> >> MVP
>> >> HOSTS file blocks all kinds of adware and malware sites, and when you
>> >> use
>> >> it
>> >> to go to pages that have such sites embedded as advertising, you will
>> >> instead see a small chunk of error page in that box.
>> >>
>> >> MVP George Geyde created a small app that regularly checks to see if
>> >> there's
>> >> a new copy of the MVP HOSTS file available, and if so downloads a new
>> >> copy.
>> >> Get HOSTS Manager here.
>> >> http://www.mvps.org/PracticallyNerded/Software.htm
>> >>
>> >> (It's at the bottom of the page.)
>> >>
>> >> After you've installed HOSTS Manager, go find the new shortcut in the
>> >> Start>Programs>Startup folder, and change its properties. Use the
>> >> following
>> >> command instead of the one that's there:
>> >>
>> >> "C:\Program Files\HOSTS File Manager\HostsManager.exe" /u
>> >>
>> >> I do not recommend TUI for anything. Yes, it's quite handy for lots of
>> >> things, but it can get you into trouble, too. Most of the things TUI
>> >> can
>> >> do
>> >> (that I'd want to do), I can do just as well without it.
>> >>
>> >> Please see the links on my sig for lots more info.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Gary S. Terhune
>> >> MS MVP Shell/User
>> >> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
>> >> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>> >>
>> >> "BAP" <BAP.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:978F35FB-D647-4F45-B933-B441D68298C2@microsoft.com...
>> >> > Thanks, Gary for your reply!
>> >> > You probably will see my replies to Ron and Don regarding my views.
>> >> > I
>> >> > have
>> >> > not attempted to have AVG scan my email. You seem to suggest that I
>> >> > should
>> >> > not. Is there a reason?
>> >> > To my knowledge, I do not have HOSTS. Not sure what it is and if
>> >> > available
>> >> > from somewhere. I do have Tweak UI, but I have not used it for
>> >> > anything.
>> >> > Sad that no tune-up tool is full-proof!
>> >> > *****
>> >> >
>> >> > "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > I agree with Ron. I would use *one* antivirus that has a resident
>> >> scanner
>> >> > > (scans on the fly, as you're using the computer) but don't have it
>> >> > > scan
>> >> > > email. Also scan regularly (during maintenance is when I do it)
>> >> > > with
>> >> AdAware
>> >> > > and Spybot. Beyond that, I'd use a couple of passive protection
>> >> > > schemes,
>> >> one
>> >> > > using the Restricted Zone in IE (SpywareBlaster does this) and one
>> >> > > using
>> >> the
>> >> > > HOSTS file -- like HOSTS Manager.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > *I* might use a Registry Cleaner or two, if I thought Registry
>> >> > > guck
>> >> might be
>> >> > > at the root of a particular problem, but I'd be very careful about
>> >> > > what
>> >> I
>> >> > > change, and not change anything I wasn't *absolutely* sure about.
>> >> > > I
>> >> don't
>> >> > > recommend such tools for the average user, and there's no such
>> >> > > thing
>> >> > > as
>> >> a
>> >> > > "tune-up tool" or Registry cleaner that is fool proof. That goes
>> >> > > for
>> >> > > "tweakers", too.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > --
>> >> > > Gary S. Terhune
>> >> > > MS MVP Shell/User
>> >> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
>> >> > > http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "BAP" <BAP.RemoveThis@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> >> > > news:43F7B937-9FCA-4219-B23C-0027E4BBAB64@microsoft.com...
>> >> > > > Posts in this Group and PCWorld articles, often, seem to
>> >> > > > encourage
>> >> > > > to
>> >> > > > download software and use it to safeguard against viruses or
>> >> intruders. I
>> >> > > > have downloaded several FREE versions of programs to see what
>> >> > > > they
>> >> > > > can
>> >> do
>> >> > > for
>> >> > > > my setup. However, I have no idea of how some of these may
>> >> > > > actually
>> >> work
>> >> > > or
>> >> > > > what should be running, whenever the computer is being powered
>> >> > > > up
>> >> > > > or
>> >> when
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > > Internet is accessed. The only ones that I have presently
>> >> > > > running
>> >> > > > are
>> >> > > Kerio
>> >> > > > Personal Firewall and AVG Free Edition. Not knowing how good
>> >> > > > these
>> >> > > > may
>> >> be,
>> >> > > I
>> >> > > > have also several that are inactive or, perhaps, run at times
>> >> > > > without
>> >> > > > actually taking any action about the findings. These are:
>> >> > > > HijackThis, CWShedder, No Adware, Lavasoft Ad-Aware, XoftSpy,
>> >> > > > SpywareBlaster, MRU-Blaster, SE Personal, Cprocess,
>> >> Spybot-Search&Destroy,
>> >> > > > PCBugDoctor, RegistryFix, RegCure,
>> >> > > > EasyCleaner, Registry Mechanic, RegSeeker, RunPCMightyMax,
>> >> > > > PCDocPro3.5
>> >> and
>> >> > > > Belarc Advisor
>> >> > > > Would anyone care to advise me as to which may be of value, how
>> >> > > > it
>> >> should
>> >> > > > be used, which of the ones listed should be avoided and the good
>> >> > > > ones
>> >> that
>> >> > > > may be missing?
>> >> > > > Thank you!
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>> >> Stay informed about: Protective Software |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 17, 2004 Posts: 2768
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:52 am
Post subject: Re: Protective Software [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Sorry for the redundancy! Didn't bother to read the thread again before
posting.
--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
"BAP" <BAP DeleteThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:92061517-A3CB-49DA-B449-37CDC1737B61@microsoft.com...
> That is certainly a long rest, Gary! Easy, Just kidding!
> On a serious note, the Hosts Manager appears to have settled down. For a
> couple of times, initially, it complained about encountering some
> installation problem and asked for a fresh download. Currently, it is
> listed
> in the Starting Programs, but not in the Running Tasks. There is an icon
> on
> the Desktop, but not in the Deskbar tray. The AVG, on the other hand, is
> visible in all quoted areas. So, I am assuming that the Hosts Manager is
> running in the background and doing what is supposed to be doing.
> Unless you feel that I am at risk of any kind, I am fine with it all.
> Thank you, again!
> ****
>
> "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
>
>> Sorry, BAP. I'm up way past my bedtime (5am here in California) and can't
>> quite decipher what's going on with your HOSTS Manager. I'll get back to
>> you
>> later (much later) today.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Gary S. Terhune
>> MS-MVP Shell/User
>> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
>> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>>
>> "BAP" <BAP DeleteThis @discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:5504BA7E-2A2C-45E0-BEED-43734946D844@microsoft.com...
>> > Gary, I have downloaded Hosts, installed it and modified its shortcut
>> > as
>> > you
>> > suggested. No applications were running when I installed it, except for
>> > whatever may have been running in
>> > the background. The icon on the Desktop showed a large 'G'. After
>> > modifying
>> > its properties, I clicked on it and its icon showed up in the Tray area
>> > of
>> > the Taskbar. Shortly after that, a display popped up with prompts to
>> > log
>> > on
>> > to the Internet. Another click on the Desktop Icon added another 'G' in
>> > the
>> > Tray. I closed all and only the G on the Desktop remained.
>> > This morning, I clicked on the Icon while logged on. The Kerio PSW
>> > asked
>> > if
>> > to allow the connection and afterwards I could see no activity of any
>> > sorts.
>> > The System Information (Start/Accessories/System Information/Sotware
>> > Environment\Running Tasks) shows the HostsManger.exe in the list.
>> > Is this what I should expect?
>> > Is HOSTS running in the background in some fashion?
>> > Is there something to be done from my part?
>> > Thank you for your time!
>> > ****
>> > "Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Scanning email is redundant. Anything that your scanner is going to
>> >> catch
>> >> it's going to catch as it's launched. So there's no reason to scan
>> >> ahead
>> >> of
>> >> time, and that scanning definitely interferes with the delivery of
>> >> mail,
>> >> often known to cause problems.
>> >>
>> >> A HOSTS file is a database of IP redirects. When your system attempts
>> >> to
>> >> go
>> >> to one of the sites listed in the database, it is redirected to some
>> >> certain
>> >> IP (like DNS, except this happens before DNS is queried.) To use this
>> >> as
>> >> a
>> >> protective mechanism, you download some HOSTS file maintained by pros
>> >> who
>> >> add addresses as they become aware of them. Microsoft MVPs maintain
>> >> one
>> >> such
>> >> HOSTS file. Every address in that file is redirected to an address
>> >> that
>> >> is
>> >> (almost) always safe: your own computer (127.0.0.1=localhost). If your
>> >> system has no home page (most don't) you get an error page instead.
>> >> The
>> >> MVP
>> >> HOSTS file blocks all kinds of adware and malware sites, and when you
>> >> use
>> >> it
>> >> to go to pages that have such sites embedded as advertising, you will
>> >> instead see a small chunk of error page in that box.
>> >>
>> >> MVP George Geyde created a small app that regularly checks to see if
>> >> there's
>> >> a new copy of the MVP HOSTS file available, and if so downloads a new
>> >> copy.
>> >> Get HOSTS Manager here.
>> >> http://www.mvps.org/PracticallyNerded/Software.htm
>> >>
>> >> (It's at the bottom of the page.)
>> >>
>> >> After you've installed HOSTS Manager, go find the new shortcut in the
>> >> Start>Programs>Startup folder, and change its properties. Use the
>> >> following
>> >> command instead of the one that's there:
>> >>
>> >> "C:\Program Files\HOSTS File Manager\HostsManager.exe" /u
>> >>
>> >> I do not recommend TUI for anything. Yes, it's quite handy for lots of
>> >> things, but it can get you into trouble, too. Most of the things TUI
>> >> can
>> >> do
>> >> (that I'd want to do), I can do just as well without it.
>> >>
>> >> Please see the links on my sig for lots more info.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Gary S. Terhune
>> >> MS MVP Shell/User
>> >> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
>> >> | | |
|
|